扫码咨询2024年新航道秋季班

November 25, 2024

雅思作文真题直击 | | 栏目推送说明

打开网易新闻 查看更多图片

每场雅思考试之后,第一时间分享本场考试雅思A类大作文的范文权威解析。欢迎每周锁定。

本期作者:王瑜

2024年11月23日雅思大作文题目

Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school and develop work experience. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

有些人认为在大学或学院学习是通往成功职业生涯的最佳途径,而另一些人则认为最好是毕业后直接找工作,积累工作经验。讨论两种观点并给出你的观点。

打开网易新闻 查看更多图片

范文及解析

Introduction

Athrivingcareer isdefined byopportunities for advancement and increasingearning potential, in contrast to a job that merelypays the bills. As arule of thumb, those who aspire to be in the dream job shouldenroll ina four-year program instead of starting their careers right out of high school.

解析

本段译文(translation):

一个繁荣的职业是由晋升的机会和增加收入的潜力来定义的,而不是仅仅支付账单的工作。根据经验法则,那些渴望找到理想工作的人应该参加四年的课程,而不是高中毕业就开始自己的职业生涯。

不太常见的词汇(less common lexical items):

❖thriving 繁荣的

❖defined by 由什么定义

❖earning potential 收入潜力

❖pays the bills 付账单

❖ enroll in 录取

❖ rule of thumb 经验法则,拇指规则

Body paragraph 1

At first glance, having a four-year college degree is aproxyfor proficiency inSTEMand health-related domains; a deprivation of thehard-earntdiplomaexplicitly keepsjob offersat bay. Another rationale relates tomulti-interdisciplinarystudies that prevail in contemporary universities. For example, combination ofdigital marketingandcognitive studiescould ultimately boost graduates’ understanding about potential consumers, while juggling between environmental science and business couldaugmentone’s environmental consciousness when making corporatedividends. Finally,academic frameworksin college make it more possible foremployees-to-beto be equipped withevidence-basedanalyzing skills,negotiating skillsand research abilities. Thesecaliberscould increase one’s odds of navigatinguncharted territoryin future career.

解析

本段译文(translation):

乍一看,拥有四年制大学学位代表着对STEM和健康相关领域的精通;缺乏来之不易的文凭显然会让工作机会无从下手。另一个理由与当代大学盛行的多学科研究有关。例如,数字营销和认知研究的结合最终可以提高毕业生对潜在消费者的了解,而在环境科学和商业之间进行平衡可以增强一个人在企业创收时的环境意识。最后,大学的学术框架使未来的员工更有可能具备基于证据的分析技能、谈判技巧和研究能力。这些能力可以增加一个人在未来职业生涯中成功横渡未知领域的几率。

不太常见的词汇(less common lexical items):

❖ STEM科学、技术、工程和数学(Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)的首字母缩写,通常用于教育和职业领域,强调这些学科在培养创新和经济发展方面的重要性。

❖ hard-earnt 艰难获得的

❖ explicitly 明显地

❖ keep … at bay 难以获得

❖ multi-interdisciplinary 多领域的

❖ digital marketing 网络营销

❖ cognitive studies 认知研究

❖ augment 增强v.

❖ dividends 分红n.

❖ academic frameworks 学术框架

❖ employees-to-be 未来工作者

❖ evidence-based 基于证据的

❖ negotiating skills 谈判技巧

❖ calibers 能力

❖ uncharted territory 未知领域

Body paragraph 2

Although the benefits of attending universities soundplausible, we cannot ignore that the so-calledproxyfor elite education has been athresholdforentry-level postsin manymammoth corporations, which prefers abudget-savingroute by offering training and education programs todegree-lessworkers. Worse,error-freeautomation not onlytrimmedmanylabor-orientedoperation workers, but also creativity-oriented posts like editors and directors. Thisshrinkinglabor needbodesill for those who spent four years in a certain field, which further explains the growingdisenchantment withthe higher education system. There is, though, another side of the story; apronouncedrise is shown in vacancies ofmiddle-skill jobs, ranging from sales representatives and clerks to inspectors and construction workers. Being asynonym formiddle-class lifestyle, these middle-skill jobs areembracedand pursued by many 18-year-olds who wish tosettle downas soon as possible.

解析

本段译文(translation):

虽然上大学的好处听起来似乎是合理的,但我们不能忽视的是,所谓的精英教育的代表已经沦为许多大公司入门级职位的门槛,但这些大公司倾向于通过向没有学位的员工提供培训和教育项目来节省预算。更糟糕的是,无差错的自动化不仅减少了许多以劳动为导向的操作人员,而且还减少了编辑和导演等以创造性为导向的职位。劳动力需求的萎缩对那些在某一领域工作了四年的人来说是不祥之兆,这也进一步解释了人们对高等教育体系越来越不抱幻想的原因。不过,这个故事还有另一面;从销售代表、职员到检查员和建筑工人等中等技能职位的空缺明显增加。作为中产阶级生活方式的代名词,这些中等技能的工作被许多希望尽快安定下来的18岁年轻人所接受和追求。

不太常见的词汇(less common lexical items):

❖ plausible 看似合理的

❖ proxy 代表n.

❖ threshold 门槛n.

❖ entry-level posts 入门级别的职位

❖ mammoth corporations 大企业

❖ budget-saving 节约成本的

❖ degree-less 没有学位的

❖ error-free 无错的

❖ trimmed 降低/裁剪

❖ labor-oriented 以体力为主的

❖ shrinking 减少

❖ bodes 预示v.

❖ disenchantment with 失去幻想

❖ pronounced 明显的

❖ middle-skill jobs 中等技巧工作

❖ synonym for 同义词

❖ embraced 拥抱/接受

❖ settle down 建立家庭

Conclusion

In essence, it is too naïve andnarrow-mindedto have auniversally-standardized paradigmof a booming career; thedreadfulreturn oflofty qualificationscould worryflabbyyoung people whodismisspersonal talents andshifting employment landscapein defining career.

解析

本段译文(translation):

从本质上讲,拥有一个普遍标准化的蓬勃发展的职业模式是过于天真和狭隘的;高学历的可怕回报可能会让那些不看重个人才能以及改变就业格局的孱弱年轻人感到担忧。

不太常见的词汇(less common lexical items):

❖ narrow-minded 狭隘的

❖ universally-standardized 普遍标准化的

❖ paradigm 模式/范式

❖ lofty qualifications 高学历

❖ dreadful 可怕的

❖ flabby孱弱的

❖ dismiss 忽略

❖ shifting employment landscape 变动中的就业格局

打开网易新闻 查看更多图片
打开网易新闻 查看更多图片